Home > War News > Send More Troops to Afghanistan

Send More Troops to Afghanistan

What a difficult decision to have to make, to send Troops in harm’s way.

Sending more people means more U.S Troops will die.  That’s the cold, hard, blunt truth. It means more combat deaths and it means more non-combat related deaths.  Some of those people killed may be friends of mine. All of those people are brothers and sisters of mine.

But here’s the thing, folks: losing or giving up in that region will have a ripple effect that is likely to last a very long time and ultimately cost way more lives.  People who want to hurt us for no other reason than the beliefs we hold dear will be permitted to run amuck – recruiting, building, planning.  Those people have already demonstrated their capabilities and ruthlessness.  If we give up then we should go all the way and effectively remove ourselves from the world stage.  Isolate ourselves.  Because if the bad guys win in that region, God help us if we make a future foreign policy decision that rubs them the wrong way.  (That was sarcasm, folks – I’m not advocating it).

What a PR boon for militant islamists everywhere should the U.S. and its allies run away.  What will that cost us in American lives down the road, I wonder.  It’s not just a loss of face it’s a loss of power.  That power that the U.S. wields is what lets me go to sleep at night and only vaguely worry that bad guys from afar will blow up my family on the way to school tomorrow.  As a Soldier, I considered myself a protector of innocents, and, with the exception of one cowardly field grade officer, damn near everyone I served with felt the same way.  I didn’t want to die, and more importantly I didn’t want anyone I worked with to get hurt or die (that wish didn’t come true).  But even more than not wanting to die, I didn’t want to lose.  Not because of some silly notion of competitiveness, but because I could see the long-term results of loss.  To me the keys to loss included::

  • leaving the region to fend for itself
  • mistreating civilians so that they hated us
  • failing to interact with the local populace with a human face, thus ensuring they perceived us as robotic invaders
  • failing to learn as much of the local culture as possible so we could be sure and offend
  • permitting bad guys to terrorize the locals
  • failing to take swift action against government corruption
  • refusing to shore up the local infrastructure so that the people would have no urgent care, law enforcement, clean water or electricity
  • basically, anything that turned civilians away from us and on to the bad guys

You see, in my simple little mind a loss degrades the sacrifices my buddies have made.  It’s like “what was the fucking point?”  I know the decision to act on General McChrystal’s recommendations for more troops is a difficult one.  But dammit, small unit leaders in Iraq and Afghanistan are making tough decisions under very hostile and imminent conditions every single day, and many of those decisions by those kids are made knowing there’s a decent chance someone will die or be seriously hurt.

I’ve read and heard so many arguments about what we “should” do: “kill ‘em all,” “pull our ‘boys’ home,” “give everyone over there X-Boxes so they’ll have something else to do.”  (okay, that last one was my idea but I’ll have to explain its origin later).  If we want to win we have to make the people over there feel safe.  Not “American Safe,” but safe within the parameters of their own completely different culture.  Americanizing them isn’t going to work, but we can help.  It’s going to take more Troops, more civilian support, greater assistance from other countries and (most importantly) political will for the long haul.  This is not going to be a war we “win” and then bring everyone home.  This is going to be a commitment.  Deal with it, peeps, the face of the world has changed.

I haven’t been able to post lately for a few reasons, and I was really planning on writing something funny, or maybe tell another Army story where I was the butt of a joke.  But my concern about the decision making process over the future of Afghanistan has taken center-stage in my thoughts lately.  I am truly terrified the wrong decision will be made.  I’m concerned that if we begin to pull out there will be troops placed unnecessarily in danger (my short-term fear).  I’m concerned that my son, who is lying next to me in the bed with the flu as I type this, and his generation will inherit a horrible set of problems should we act short-sightedly (long-term fear).  I wish I was a better writer, more articulate, so I could more accurately express my worries.  I know I was just a peon junior Cav officer when I served, and that my service was in Iraq, but I’m telling you if we (the galactic we) screw this one up we and our kids will pay the price.

Someone more articulate than me put together a good post over at BlackFive.  I know it’s kinda old, but it’s worth the quick read.  Here it is.

Thanks.

-Dacker

Bookmark and Share
Categories: War News Tags: ,
  1. October 6th, 2009 at 20:06 | #1

    Dracker, this is a great post and you have nothing to wish for as far as writing and getting your thoughts and concerns across. Your long term fears are felt by the majority of Americans, but the liberal media pushes the other way, making it hard for moderate and middle minded Americans to see alternatives.

    I love you guys and gals serving ‘over there’ and grieve when one is lost. But it is a war and we have to have boots on the ground. Biden’s desire to pull people out and use drowns more is almost criminal. The drowns are awesome, but there has to be men on the ground to lead, support and backup the use of the things.

    One last thing I feel is important. No matter what happens in the future in those shit-hole of countries, non of your friends and fellow troops died in vain. Accident, IEDs or small arms fire, they died serving their country and at that moment in time they were heroes. No matter the outcome, nothing will change that. They gave all in defense of our country, their friends and for freedom. What ever happens after that has nothing to do with them.

    I give you and example…in the book, documentary and movie about the Black Hawk Down incident in Mogadishu , there was a soldier who was riding a desk and begged to go out on the mission. He got to go and fought heroically, receiving some medals for his participation.

    After his discharge, he was arrested for incest with his daughter. His wife wanted his story deleted from the book and the medals taken away from him. For his actions with his daughter I would love to see him castrated and put to death. But I disagree with taking his medals, because at that moment in time he was a true warrior and deserved his rewards.

    What happened years later does not take away from his actions in Mogadishu. That is my limited way of saying no one you ever knew or was familiar with has died in vain.

    I look forward to reading all your stuff, funny or not.

    John

  1. No trackbacks yet.